Katherine Hayhoe Explains The Strange Disconnect Between Evangelical Christians & Climate Science
Credit to Author: Steve Hanley| Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2019 21:15:17 +0000
Published on November 1st, 2019 | by Steve Hanley
November 1st, 2019 by Steve Hanley
Katherine Hayhoe is an evangelical Christian. She is also the co-director of the Climate Center at Texas Tech University. In an opinion piece for the New York Times, she explains how to resolve the conflict in America between climate science and evangelical Christians. Religion is an explosive topic, one which provokes strong opinions. It is not CleanTechnica’s job to advocate for one religious point of view over another. But what Professor Hayhoe has to say is relevant to us all.
Hayhoe begins by saying she was raised in religious family in Canada. Her father was a science teacher who taught her that “science is the study of God’s creation. If we truly believe that God created this amazing universe, bringing matter and energy to life out of a formless empty void of nothing, then how could studying his creation ever be in conflict with his written word?”
In selecting her career path, she says “I chose what to study precisely because of my faith, because climate change disproportionately affects the poor and vulnerable, those already most at risk today. To me, caring about and acting on climate was a way to live out my calling to love others as we’ve been loved ourselves by God.”
Her beliefs have earned her many enemies, who use social media to attack her. Those attacks are “often by people with Bible verses in their social media profiles who accuse me of spreading Satan’s lies, or sometimes by others who share my concerns about climate change but wonder why I bother talking to ‘those people.’ The attacks I receive come via email, Twitter, Facebook comments, phone calls and even handwritten letters.”
“I track them all,” she says, “and I’ve noticed two common denominators in how most of the authors choose to identify themselves: first, as political conservatives, no matter what country they’re from; and second, in the United States, as conservative Christians, because the label “evangelical” has itself been co-opted as shorthand for a particular political ideology these days.”
“But I refuse to give it up, because I am a theological evangelical, one of those who can be simply defined as someone who takes the Bible seriously. This stands in stark contrast to today’s political evangelicals, whose statement of faith is written first by their politics and only a distant second by the Bible and who, if the two conflict, will prioritize their political ideology over theology.”
Why engage with her detractors?
“Because I believe that evangelicals who take the Bible seriously already care about climate change (although they might not realize it). Climate change will strike hard against the very people we’re told to care for and love, amplifying hunger and poverty, and increasing risks of resource scarcity that can exacerbate political instability, and even create or worsen refugee crises.
“Then there’s pollution, biodiversity loss, habitat fragmentation, species extinction: climate change makes all those worse, too. In fact, if we truly believe we’ve been given responsibility for every living thing on this planet (including each other) as it says in Genesis 1, then it isn’t only a matter of caring about climate change: We should be at the front of the line demanding action.”
“Why do surveys in the United States consistently show white evangelicals and white Catholics at the bottom of those Americans concerned about the changing climate?” Hayhoe asks. “It turns out, it’s not where we go to church (or don’t) that determines our opinion on climate. It’s not even our religious affiliation. Hispanic Catholics are significantly more likely than other Catholics to say the Earth is getting warmer, according to a 2015 survey, and they have the same Pope.”
“It’s because of the alliance between conservative theology and conservative politics that has been deliberately engineered and fostered over decades of increasingly divisive politics on issues of race, abortion and now climate change, to the point where the best predictor of whether we agree with the science is simply where we fall on the political spectrum.”
“An important and successful part of that framing has been to cast climate change as an alternate religion. This is sometimes subtle, as the church sign that reads, ‘On Judgment Day, you’ll meet Father God not Mother Earth.’ Other times this point is made much more blatantly, like when Senator Ted Cruz of Texas told Glenn Beck in 2015 that ‘climate change is not a science, it’s a religion,’ or when Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina said at a 2014 event hosted by the Council on Foreign Relations that ‘the problem is Al Gore’s turned this thing into a religion.’
“Why is this framing so effective? Because some 72 percent of people in the United States already identify with a specific religious label, according to a recent survey by the Pew Research Center. And if you are a Christian, you know what to do when a false prophet comes along preaching a religion that worships the created rather than the Creator: Reject it!
“So this framing plays right into the narrative that scientists are a godless bunch who have teamed up with liberals (and perhaps the Antichrist, according to some comments I’ve received) to rule the world and overthrow religion, an agenda that any right-minded believer will oppose until his or her dying breath. In fact, 51 percent of scientists said in a 2009 Pew survey that they believed in God or a universal spirit or higher power.”
When Katherine Hayhoe is asked if she believes in climate change, she says “No.” Why? Because that diffuses skepticism about her motives and opens the door to a candid discussion.
“I explain that climate change is not a belief system. We know that the Earth’s climate is changing thanks to observations, facts and data about God’s creation that we can see with our eyes and test with the sound minds that God has given us. And still more fundamentally,” she goes on to say, it allows her “to explain why it matters: because real people are being affected today; and we believe that God’s love has been poured in our hearts to share with our brothers and sisters here and around the world who are suffering.
“After hundreds, even thousands, of such conversations, I’ve grown to understand how much of this opposition to the idea that the climate is changing, that humans are responsible, that the impacts are serious and that the time to act is now, comes from fear: fear of loss of our way of life, fear of being told that our habits are bad for society, fear of changes that will leave us worse off, fear of siding with those who have no respect for our values and beliefs.
“But as a Christian, I believe the solution to this fear lies in the same faith that many non-Christians wrongly assume drives our rejection of the science. In the Apostle Paul’s letter to Timothy, he reminds us that we have not been given a spirit of fear. Fear is not from God. Instead, we’ve been given a spirit of power, to act rather than to remain paralyzed in anxiety, fear, or guilt; a spirit of love, to have compassion for others, particularly those less fortunate than us (the very people most affected by a changing climate); and a sound mind, to use the information we have to make good decisions.”
“Connecting our identity to action is key, and that’s exactly why I don’t typically begin with science when starting conversations about climate change with those who disagree. Rather, I begin by talking about what we share most. For some, this could be the well-being of our community; for others, our children; and for fellow Christians, it’s often our faith.
“By beginning with what we share and then connecting the dots between that value and a changing climate, it becomes clear how caring about this planet and every living thing on it is not somehow antithetical to who we are as Christians, but rather central to it. Being concerned about climate change is a genuine expression of our faith, bringing our attitudes and actions more closely into line with who we already are and what we most want to be.
And that’s why I’m more convinced now than ever that the two most central parts of my identity — that of climate scientist and evangelical Christian — aren’t incompatible. They are what’s made me who I am.”
If you do not know this yet, the Koch Brothers have spent the past 50 years creating their own religion, one based not on a Higher Power but on the power of money. Their catechism is simple: the free market is good, government regulation is bad. For more on this subject, please see Jane Mayer’s exhaustively researched book Dark Money or Leonard’s equally well documented book Kochland.
The Koch playbook is all about creating doubt about climate science so Koch Industries can continue to rake in obscene profits based on the extraction, transportation, refining, and sale of oil and gas. ExxonMobil is on trial right now for lying to investors about what it knew about carbon emissions and a warming planet, but Koch Industries has been at the forefront of the campaign to demonize climate science longer than most Americans have been alive.
Early in their campaign, the decision was made to target evangelical Christians. The sales pitch was that climate scientist were concocting an alternate religion that would destroy the bedrock principles that underlie their beliefs. The campaign has succeeded far beyond the wildest dreams of Charles and David Koch. David died earlier this year.
Katherine Hayhoe’s words can undo the damage done by the cynical exploitation of evangelicals who have played for suckers by the Kochs. There is no rational reason why evangelicals should prefer the destruction of the Earth so Koch Industries can gorge itself further on profits derived from despoiling the Earth. Professor Hayhoe shows us how to address the fears of evangelicals — fears that have been shamelessly exploited by Koch Industries. There may be no more important lesson for us all in this time when the fate of the Earth hangs in the balance.
Follow CleanTechnica on Google News.
It will make you happy & help you live in peace for the rest of your life.
Steve Hanley Steve writes about the interface between technology and sustainability from his home in Rhode Island and anywhere else the Singularity may lead him. His motto is, “Life is not measured by how many breaths we take but by the number of moments that take our breath away!” You can follow him on Google + and on Twitter.