SEC commish: UCF should fix issue, stop blaming
NEW YORK — Southeastern Conference commissioner Greg Sankey on Thursday said UCF should look “inward” to address the strength of schedule issues that have held back the Knights in the College Football Playoff rankings.
Central Florida was ranked eighth in the final playoff rankings by the selection committee on Sunday after finishing a second consecutive regular season undefeated. The top four teams make the playoff.
The Knights (12-0), who have won 25 straight games and consecutive American Athletic Conference championships, were never given any serious consideration for the playoff. They will instead play LSU in the Fiesta Bowl.
Last season, UCF declared itself national champions following a Peach Bowl win over Auburn to finish with a perfect 13-0 record.
UCF has won 25 straight games but missed out on the CFP for the second straight year. Despite being disappointed by their fate, the Knights say they’re excited to play LSU in the Fiesta Bowl.
Following what he described as one of the most contentious debates in the five years of the College Football Playoff, executive director Bill Hancock said there is still no movement to expand the playoff beyond its current four-team field.
Undefeated UCF is looking to secure its second consecutive undefeated season. To do it, they’ll have to beat a resurgent LSU squad in one of the more fascinating matchups of this bowl season.
Sankey was asked about UCF at the Learfield Intercollegiate Athletics Forum. The commissioner compared UCF’s situation to when the SEC placed only three teams in the NCAA men’s basketball tournament in 2016.
“We weren’t living up to our expectations. Rather than point to the selection committee, other people … we looked inward and said: ‘How do we adjust to the circumstances around us?'” Sankey said. “I would observe that’s the challenge for everybody at the FBS level.”
Sankey later told reporters the SEC encouraged its schools to start scheduling more difficult nonconference basketball games as a way to build tournament-worthy resumes.
“When it was us and when it was men’s basketball, we knew we had two top-50 teams in 2015-16, which means you had virtually no top-50 wins in men’s basketball,” Sankey said. “How are you going to access those wins? You have to improve your nonconference schedule.”
UCF athletic director Danny White has been highly critical of the playoff selections, and he objected to the comparison between college football’s postseason and scheduling process and college basketball.
Nonconference football games are typically scheduled years in advance. In basketball, schedules are often completed months before the season. White also noted 3 percent of FBS teams make the playoff while 19 percent of Division I teams make the men’s NCAA tournament field of 68.
“Basketball teams are rewarded for playing tough teams such as UCF through metrics like RPI or NET, while football teams avoid us because they’re concerned about the ‘eye test,'” White told AP in a text message.
NCAA statistics measure strength of schedule by simple winning percentage of opponents. UCF ranked 71st out of 130 FBS teams after the regular season (.530 winning percentage by opponents), well behind most of the playoff participants and contenders, though ahead of No. 6 Ohio State (82nd, .515).
The Sagarin computer ratings put the Knights’ strength of schedule even farther behind Power Five contenders. UCF faced the 90th-ranked schedule in all Division I, including FCS, according to Sagarin. Among the top six, Clemson‘s schedule ranked lowest at 48th, according to Sagarin.
Using the advanced metric S&P+, which ranks team using play-by-play data, UCF’s schedule is the 83rd-toughest in FBS, but not that far behind most of the top six teams: Ohio State is 55th; Notre Dame 61st; Oklahoma 68th; and Clemson 76th.
“As I’ve said many times, we are willing to play any Power Six program in the country,” White said, using the AAC’s slogan. “The challenge is that not many are willing to play us.”
The biggest obstacle for the Knights when it comes to the selection committee seems to be a lack of games against teams highly regarded by the committee. UCF played no opponent that finished in the committee’s final top 25. The rest of the top six each faced at least two teams in the committee’s final rankings.
“I don’t think there are simple solutions necessarily,” Sankey said. “There are solutions. One’s going to have to evaluate their circumstances fully to make those decisions. My observation is there is a need to look inward. “
White, who said there is nothing UCF can do inwardly “to fix an inadequate postseason for college football,” has called for an expanded playoff.
“We’re at four though,” Sankey said. “Everybody walked into this with their eyes open. Strength of schedule is a part of it. Resume is a part of it. It’s not just about going undefeated in a season. That was never a criteria: If you go undefeated you’re in the top four. But there are complexities to it and there are complexities that will be unique for every program.”